Problem Detection combines Qualitative & Quantitative research methods to reveal Key Competitive Weaknesses.
Devised by BBDO in the early 1970's, PDR led to Burger King's most effective ad campaign. Learn how this consumer research method can work for you.
Qualitative research methods, such as focus groups or in-depth one-on-one
interviews, probe for attitudes, core beliefs, and emotional
reactions to concepts or existing products. Often focus groups
will play back ideas they've heard or read in advertising. The
results are inferential.
Quantitative research methods, such as surveys, polls and mall- intercepts, ask a large sample
of persons to rationally score a list of simple statements. The results
can be projected with some confidence into the general population.
Problem Detection
Research combines Qualitative & Quantitative methods to discover what people most dislike about a larger competitor's product or service.
Then you offer a better alternative in operations and advertising.
The
basic flaw in most consumer research is that if you ask people what they want from a product or service, they will play back generic messages they've
heard in advertising. You get statistical mush.
However, people love to gripe. If you ask
what problems they have with existing brands, they will happily oblige you with
long litanies of real or imagined competitive faults.
Step One. Qualitative Research.
Assemble one or two
focus groups of people who patronize your main competition. Ask them
to think of any problems, gripes, or other points of dissatisfaction
they may have. Play devil's advocate. Take notes. Compile a list
of 40 to 50 gripes - anything that might be mentioned by anyone.
Step Two. Quantitative Research.
Ask a hundred or so people via telephone, mall-intercept or online surveys
to score each gripe on frequency and importance. Use a 1-to-10
scale for each parameter.
"How often does this occur? How important is it to you?"
Compute the Frequency X Importance scores for each gripe.
The highest scoring gripes are your competitor's key
vulnerabilities.
Step Three. Technical Scrutiny.
Identify the highest scoring problem that
you can solve - either with a product or service change, packaging, or
simply with better advertising. Then concentrate your efforts on that positioning.
This technique
was first used by BBDO in New York back in the early 1970's to determine the correct strategy for
Burger King, which was then quite a bit smaller than McDonald's.
PDR revealed that people's
biggest problem with McDonald's was that they always made their sandwiches the same way. After technical scrutiny and some minor
operations changes, Burger King launched its famous "Have It Your
Way" campaign.
"Hold the
pickles, hold the lettuce, special orders don't upset us..."

Here's how Problem Detection can work for a smaller company, like yours.

The Speedy Cleaner chain could ask people what
they want from any dry cleaner. They'd say, "24 Hour
Service", "Low Prices," and "Clean Clothes."
Why? Because those generic promises appear on the big sign outside ACE CLEANERS
down the street.
In a PDR, you ask
the same people if they have any problems with ACE.
Make a list. Then call a couple hundred people and ask them to
participate in a brief interview. You might limit the gripe list to
10 to 15 problems you think you could solve.
Average the Frequency and Importance scores, then compute the quotients. Your score
sheet might look like this:
 |
ACE CLEANERS PDR - 214 Respondents |
 |
 |
FREQ |
IMP |
F X I |
| 1 |
Prices higher than others |
2 |
7 |
14 |
| 2 |
Inconvenient store hours |
1 |
5 |
5 |
| 3 |
Inconvenient location |
6 |
2 |
12 |
| 4 |
Owners not on site |
3 |
1 |
3 |
| 5 |
Dry cleaning doesn't remove all spots |
3 |
9 |
27 |
| 6 |
Dry cleaning damages fine
clothing |
2 |
10 |
20 |
| 7 |
Dry cleaning leaves whites dingy |
6 |
7 |
42 |
| 8 |
Shirts
not always crisply
starched |
2 |
8 |
16 |
| 9 |
Shirts are not well-pressed |
1 |
7 |
7 |
| 10 |
Items of clothing are missing |
1 |
10 |
10 |
| 11 |
No one to do minor repairs |
9 |
2 |
18 |
| 12 |
Buttons are missing on shirts |
2 |
8 |
16 |
| 13 |
Collar stays are missing on
shirts |
7 |
2 |
14 |
 |
AVERAGE |
3.5 |
6.0 |
15.7 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |